Skip to main content
ABOUT · OUR HERITAGE

Born from a fight for the right to choose

Health Choice UK carries forward the spirit of Consumers for Health Choice — a long-running British campaign for fair access to vitamins and supplements, and for ordinary people's right to make informed decisions about their own health.

2002
EU Food Supplements Directive (2002/46/EC) adopted
legislation.gov.uk
2003
Implemented in the UK via the Food Supplements (England) Regulations
GOV.UK
12 Jul 2005
European Court of Justice upheld the Directive's validity
ECJ, Joined Cases C-154/04 & C-155/04
~9 years
Length of the Consumers for Health Choice campaign
UK Parliament EDM

The campaign that shaped us

Consumers for Health Choice was a real UK campaign that ran for the best part of a decade, defending public access to higher-potency vitamin and mineral supplements. Its concern was simple and consumer-led: that ordinary people should be free to choose safe, popular products, and should be told clearly when rules were about to take those choices away.

The flashpoint was the EU Food Supplements Directive (2002/46/EC), adopted in 2002 and brought into UK law through the Food Supplements (England) Regulations 2003 and equivalent regulations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The Directive set "positive lists" — only the vitamins and minerals named in its annexes, in the permitted chemical forms, could lawfully be sold. Many established products faced removal from shelves to meet the compliance deadline.

Alongside the Health Food Manufacturers Association and the National Association of Health Stores, campaigners pursued national derogations and raised concerns in Parliament, while the wider debate moved to the international stage of the Codex Alimentarius Commission — the body created in 1963 by the FAO and WHO to set international food standards. A linked legal challenge, brought in part by the Alliance for Natural Health, reached the European Court of Justice, which on 12 July 2005 upheld the Directive's validity.

The campaigners did not win every argument. But they made a lasting point that we still believe in: consumers deserve plain information and a genuine say in decisions about their own health — not to be talked over.

Your health. Your decisions. Made well-informed. We don't tell you what to buy — we make sure you can decide for yourself, with the facts in front of you.
Health Choice UK · Editorial team
Where the rules stand today

The framework that grew out of that era still governs UK supplements. The UK never adopted harmonised EU maximum permitted levels for most vitamins and minerals; instead, safety has long leaned on national science — notably the Food Standards Agency's Expert Group on Vitamins and Minerals, whose 2003 Safe Upper Levels for Vitamins and Minerals report set 8 Safe Upper Levels and 22 Guidance Levels. More recent tolerable upper intake level guidance was published by EFSA in November 2024. For your own dose, a pharmacist or GP is the right person to ask.

How that legacy shows up in our work

The campaign was about access and honest information. Those two ideas run through everything we publish.

  • Categories, never sales pitches

    We review types of product and the criteria that matter — not named brands — so you can judge any option on the shelf for yourself.

  • Plain about the rules

    Where MHRA, NICE, SACN or the law affects a choice, we say so in everyday language and link to the official source.

  • No cut, no conflict

    We don't sell products and we don't take commission. Our only loyalty is to the reader making the decision.

  • Signpost real help

    For anything personal or clinical we point you to the NHS, a GP or a pharmacist — we inform decisions, we don't replace medical advice.

Choosing with confidence is the whole point

That is what Consumers for Health Choice stood for, and it is what we try to do for every category we cover — from supplements to home monitoring and mobility aids.